Two days ago, on Monday, Perkins quoted a supposed gay activist who is supposedly now a Trump supporter due to the Orlando shooting. It turned out to be an anonymous post on a far-right website. Perkins also quoted a tweet from a supposed LGBT person in Phoenix. That anonymous Twitter account was created on June 12 and is responsible for all of three tweets. Now he is quoting unnamed columnists at unnamed outlets with quotes that are actually quite accurate in describing how Perkins and his ilk were contributors to the climate that may have enabled the Orlando shooter. Perkins also claims that the shooter was gay and, therefore, this could not have been an anti-gay massacre.
And the Left's Christian blame game goes on. It's the religious right, columnists rant, who created this "toxic climate" with their Kim Davises and H.B. 2s. Citing North Carolina and Mississippi, liberals insist, "The Christian right has introduced 200 anti-LGBT bills in the last six months, and people are [pointing the finger at] Islam for this. No." First of all, people are blaming radical Islam because the shooter did. Secondly, it's a little ridiculous to suggest that disagreements over special rights for people who identify as LGBT are responsible, since even the gunman's ex-wife alleges he was gay. While the investigation is ongoing, the 29-year-old Islamist was reportedly a regular at gay clubs, tried to get romantically involved with a male coworker, and had profiles on several gay dating apps. It's time for liberals to stop tiptoeing around the obvious and embrace what the facts already do: which is that a hateful ideology -- not guns, Christians, or anti-Muslim sentiment -- is to blame.In point of fact Tony Perkins does contribute to a toxic climate. Dehumanizing and denigrating gay people makes it easier to do violence to them. There is a reason that FRC is designated a hate group by the Southern Poverty Law Center. Even here Perkins cannot help himself. He describes equal rights for LGBT citizens as “special rights.”
I have seen no evidence to support Perkins' claim that the shooter was a regular at gay clubs, had a romantic gay relationship or had profiles on gay dating sites. According to the AP: “A U.S. official briefed on the case said Tuesday that the FBI is investigating reports that [the shooter] had been a regular at the nightclub and had used gay dating apps.”
Suppose the shooter was gay or bisexual? Perkins seems to think that this would somehow confirm that this was solely the act of an Islamic terrorist. Perkins implies that a man would not slaughter his own affinity group. Would this not then serve as the perfect example of self-loathing behavior? After all, shame is currency for religious conservatives, including Muslims. I don't doubt for a second that Islamic religious zealotry was a factor, possibly the prime motivator. However the bigotry that comes from the Vatican, Conservative Christians and people like Mr. Perkins is certainly a contributing factor. There is a reason that a gay bar was targeted. It is reasonable to conclude that the shooter hated gay people including, perhaps, himself. This was a suicidal act.
Some Christians are likely to be reflective with respect to their anti-gay rhetoric. The ruling in Obergefell v. Hodges has created a frenzy in the Christian Right that is extraordinarily disproportionate to the effect of same-sex marriage on them or their ministries. A torrent of revenge legislation has flooded state chambers. HB2 is the perfect example. Aside from its effect on transgender people it nullified sexual orientation nondiscrimination protections that existed throughout much of urban North Carolina.
Perkins is looking for a societal hold-harmless for the Orlando shooting. Given Perkins' bigotry and the fact that anti-gay rhetoric was likely a contributing factor that should be something that is quite difficult for him to obtain.