Biblical Bob Eschliman asks if GOP did a bait and switch on FADA

No Biblical Bob, it was not a bait and switch. Your question is easily answered. While the hearings made for good Kabuki, behind the scenes fellow congressmen presumably clued Paul Labrador in that his little bill was unconstitutional; It not only established religion but preferenced one religion over others. There is a reason that the First Amendment Defense Act remains stalled for over a year in the House Ways & Means and the Senate Judiciary committees.

Public hearings on FADA were little more than Kabuki

Labrador made some changes which, heaven forbid, recognized the existence of same-sex marriage. He essentially poison-pilled his own bill. The average GOPer would sooner suck on a urinal mint than vote for a bill that accepts what has been determined to be a constitutional right.

Related articles

• A federal License-To-Discriminate bill - and then some
• Ms. "Bait & Switch" now claims that singles and gay rights that will abolish ALL marriage
• Lewisburg, WVA provides a microcosm for LGBT non-discrimination
• ONE of Georgia's license-to-discriminate bills is on hold
• Georgia senate merges two anti-gay bills
• Staver finally figured out that FADA is DOA
• NOM finally addresses FADA - With Robert Oscar Lopez
• ADF's myths of myths
• Stella Morabito explains the sinister LGBT agenda
• ADF: The reason to oppose marriage equality is that a baker violated anti-discrimination laws in a state without marriage equality