|Peter Sprigg - FRC|
Last week, Sprigg posted a piece on FRC's blog titled Critics of Natural Marriage Remain in Search of Legal Rationale in 7th Circuit Argument. The sophistry exhibited in that one title is astonishing. Proponents of marriage equality have never been, and never will be, “critics” of opposite-sex marriage; Same-sex marriage is just as “natural” as opposite sex marriage; and the legal rationale for civil marriage of same-sex couples has been clearly defined by more than 20 jurists lately. For the record it is comprised of both equal protection and due process.